(3 Aprile 2009)
domenica 29 marzo 2009
LA CRISI LA PAGHINO I PADRONI E I BANCHIERI!
"We will not pay for your crisis": this slogan was still inflamed and inflamed the struggles of the younger generation all over Europe, from Italy to Greece. A new generation that looks to the class struggle can not hear talk of lying and false myths about the "end of communism" or a "new world order" that would have occurred after the fall of the Berlin Wall, but in a real test on own skin the cost of a catastrophic crisis of capitalism that brings all the capitalist governments to attack the heavily jobs, wages, social status, the right to study and in general living conditions of workers and their children.
E 'in this context that the fight took place sample of Italian students (with parents, teachers and school workers) against the criminals of the Berlusconi government cuts on funding for public schools and universities, and against plans to counter the minister Gelmini .
WHY 'THE "WAVE" did not win?
However, the defeat of the movement with the approval of the decrees and the end of the protest require us to serious reflection to understand the causes and not to repeat the same mistakes in the case of a revival of the movement.
For this purpose it is useful to compare the 'Wave' Italian experience with the fight victorious, as the anti-CPE movement in France, through a struggle of students and workers united specimen was able to defeat the hateful First Employment Contract. In Italy however, the absence of a real prospect of the struggle and the lack of a true test of strength against the government (in the belief that a victory could be achieved by doing more miles as possible in parades), have gradually wasted his strength and led students to gradually abandon the struggle.
The showdown against the government is done only with the unity of the struggle between students and workers, which has enabled France to create a mass movement that overthrew the government Chiraque, one of the most reactionary, the EPC. Who says, as the Network for Self-training (disobedient) who led the movement in an authoritarian way to Rome, "the classic slogan unit student-workers is now finally overcome" (www.uniriot.org) mystifies reality and did not care about the victory of the movement but only the interests of bureaucratic control over it, as shown by Francis Raparelli and its political line "post self '. It takes the field when the working class, that is, who runs the production that the bosses and their governments are starting to get scared and you can thus create a show of force successful. Hiding this fact, the disobedient have done nothing that weaken the struggle.
And this bureaucracy has prevented any democratic form of student participation in the movement, for fear of losing control over it have rejected authoritarian methods and fought with the most democratic form of organization that can exist for a fight and that animated the experience of the victorious movement of workers and students: coordination at various levels (from the University of the national one) consisting of delegates elected by the assemblies of students and revocable at any time by them. This principle is quite different from that of middle-class delegation, made up of corrupt congressmen and senators who do not respond to any of their mandate. The coordination is delegated to on the contrary, the most direct form of democracy that would allow, besides to centralize and coordinate the struggle to involve students actively in the mass of the debate within the movement. Self-reform
OR FIGHT IN DEFENCE UNIVERSITY 'PUBLIC?
Another key element that has been a weak point was the proposal by Central saddled disobedient to the movement of so-called "self-reform" focusing on 'self', but what lies behind these words? The design of the disobedient (if you truly believe) is to be poor in the context of a university teaching paths "self-managed" students. Apart from being a vague proposal and destructive, it implies the acceptance of university autonomy, the first evil that gave birth to all the counter-current, and does not doubt the university model currently propionate. The central question that must be addressed is that of a struggle for a public, free of charge, mass, quality and service to the masses and not individuals. Only this platform is capable of defending the right to study and make the mobilization of students and popular mass struggle, involving other oppressed sectors of society.
FOR THE REVIVAL OF MOVEMENT FOR UNITY 'ANTI-working students!
At present, after the ebb, it is objectively difficult to restart an immediate mobilization of the scale seen in recent months, but the global crisis is producing and preparing in Europe and around the world great social upheaval against the conditions of life imposed by capitalism . When workers and new generations will return to mobilize, however, will require a shift in direction: a platform will rise to the occasion and fight outside the nonsense served up such unrealistic from the disobedient. This is the platform that we have proposed as a revolutionary students Coordinating the movement and we believe it is a necessary starting point in the case of his recovery: • Fight to the bitter end
IN DEFENSE OF SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITY '
• PUBLIC FOR THE REPEAL OF UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY AND ALL CONTRIRIFORME 90s FROM ZECCHINO-BERLINGUER
• ELIMINATION OF PUBLIC FUNDING FOR PRIVATE SOLID INVESTMENT FOR SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES '
• PUBLIC EDUCATION FOR THE PUBLIC, FREE OF MASS AND QUALITY' OF THE SERVICE AND THE POPULAR MASSES
• UNIT 'FOR A FIGHT WITH THE WORLD OF WORK
• ORGANIZE THE STRUGGLE FOR COORDINATION WITH DELEGATES ELECTED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS AND WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME
BERLUSCONI • HUNT FOR ALTERNATIVE Anticapitalist
Based on this we propose as a CSR program is a front of struggle for all organizations that recognize it.
pay those who have never paid! COORDINATION
revolutionary students - Rome
www.csrstudenti.blogspot.com csrstudenti@gmail.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment